Hi, On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Ondřej Čertík <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'll ask here what I asked on the pull request. Can you give a list of >> the things that we would have to do to support both. I'm concerned >> about the annoyance factor here. Obviously, we've had a compatibility >> file for some time, so we are no strangers to such things, but I'd >> like to know what we'd be getting into here, beyond the obvious >> print() instead of print. > > Let's discuss the possible annoyances with this. So far it seems to me > the changes are relatively minor, but let's make sure about that. > > Let's also discuss the advantages of this (e.g. one source base works > in all Pythons, no more 2to3 slowness, no more problems with setup.py, > easier release from one tarball --- if we want to, ...).
And easy_install may work again as well - a big win for us in the binary-installers world. > Sean, I owe you a beer for this PR. :) Thanks for your work. Yes - thanks very much for doing this - gratitude and enthusiasm and promise of further beer flying across the wire, Cheers, Matthew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
