Wouldn't creating another PR add to the problem of checking more PRs?

On Tue, 6 Feb 2024, 5:52 pm Mohit Kumar, <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have found some old opened issues that should be closed, so, is it a
> good idea to open a new PR (which has title like "CLOSED [issue]..." with a
> test, if similar tests do not exists) or creating a new conversation here,
> IMO PR is a better option. PRs with title like CLOSED [issue].. could be
> prioritized?
>
> On Tuesday 6 February 2024 at 17:37:13 UTC+5:30 [email protected]
> wrote:
>
>> Do you have some guidelines you follow or just some general advice for
>> people who are willing to do that work . It will also help new contributors
>> like me understand what things need to be checked apart from the ones
>> mentioned in the developer documentation before I make a pull request .
>>
>> Shishir
>> On Tuesday 6 February 2024 at 17:30:01 UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps other things should be mentioned in the GSOC application
>>> instructions. I do think that the PR requirement is reasonable as a
>>> baseline for GSOC though.
>>>
>>> To be clear opening pull requests is a good thing. Reviewing pull
>>> requests is a lot of work for maintainers though. If lots of people
>>> start opening PRs but not doing anything else to help by e.g.
>>> reviewing those PRs then we will just have lots of unreviewed PRs
>>> which is not so useful. Especially many of these PRs have very basic
>>> problems like "a test should be added" or "the test should be for what
>>> is actually fixed". These could easily be reviewed by many of the new
>>> contributors.
>>>
>>> This PR is a good example of the work problem that is created by
>>> opening PRs rather than reviewing them:
>>> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/26117
>>>
>>> What is needed is for someone to verify that the definition of
>>> assoc_legendre as used in SymPy matches with the definition that is
>>> used in mpmath. This is partly about reading the docs and partly just
>>> a case of doing some numerical checks but it needs to be done
>>> systematically paying close attention to any special values and to
>>> what SymPy's symbolic evaluation handles. Writing the code and opening
>>> the PR without doing that checking leaves all of the work to the
>>> reviewer. Anyone else could review it though by doing that checking.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Oscar
>>>
>>> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 07:59, Jason Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Note that we get lots of PRs at this time because we require GSoC
>>> applicants to have at least one merged PR. We could encourage the other
>>> activities if we allow those to fulfill the requirement for the GSoC
>>> application.
>>> >
>>> > Jason
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 6:05 AM Aaron Meurer <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I'll also add that if you want to, we'll give triage permissions to
>>> >> just about anyone so they can go through and label old issues (triage
>>> >> permissions give you permissions to label issues). Just ask me or
>>> >> Oscar.
>>> >>
>>> >> Aaron Meurer
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 2:25 PM Oscar Benjamin
>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Hi all,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > There are currently a large number of new contributors opening
>>> various
>>> >> > pull requests and commenting on issues in the SymPy repo. This is
>>> >> > great to see, and I want to thank everyone who has been
>>> contributing.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I would like to highlight though that opening pull requests is not
>>> the
>>> >> > only way to contribute to SymPy. There are many other ways to
>>> >> > contribute. In fact more important than opening pull requests is
>>> >> > *reviewing* pull requests and issues. For example if you can see
>>> that
>>> >> > a pull request likely needs some changes, then it is helpful to
>>> >> > comment on the pull request and suggest what changes are needed
>>> until
>>> >> > it looks ready to merge. I am sure that some of the new
>>> contributors
>>> >> > could tell quite quickly what changes would be needed in many of
>>> the
>>> >> > recently opened pull requests.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > In fact one of the most useful things that a relatively new
>>> >> > contributor can do is to review old issues. The SymPy repo
>>> currently
>>> >> > has over 4000 open issues. Many of these are old and are no longer
>>> >> > relevant or already fixed. You can often review these issues just
>>> by
>>> >> > testing the code in them. If the issue seems to be fixed then a
>>> pull
>>> >> > request with a test could be opened to close the issue. If you do
>>> want
>>> >> > to review old issues then I suggest using the issue labels to focus
>>> on
>>> >> > a particular area of the code base like "integrals" or "solvers"
>>> etc.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > This sort of work is actually much more helpful to the project than
>>> >> > opening pull requests for "easy to fix" issues.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Oscar
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "sympy" group.
>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAHVvXxQFLH7L%3DjO8EosasVETJn1fCmWaCvbYp%3DMbxvQmg1pB9Q%40mail.gmail.com.
>>>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "sympy" group.
>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAKgW%3D6%2B8WUQJa_d%2BATjAekCbRgi4D6XCevJqiCmf0EsieSf8gQ%40mail.gmail.com.
>>>
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "sympy" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAP7f1AhzY_A2Rt9aMQy1M_6MzZ09L1uP0p_0RLcni1TpX8rwpw%40mail.gmail.com.
>>>
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/a8251f51-7852-4128-ae68-5e85e589b44en%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/a8251f51-7852-4128-ae68-5e85e589b44en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAOCT_jRqYQ53sq%3DvC4uZsd%2B%3Dkr%2BMUff7-vUhG93a2-RbwZix4g%40mail.gmail.com.
  • [sympy... Oscar Benjamin
    • R... Aaron Meurer
      • ... Shishir Kushwaha
        • ... HARSH KASAT
          • ... Mohit Kumar
      • ... Jason Moore
        • ... Oscar Benjamin
          • ... Shishir Kushwaha
            • ... Mohit Kumar
              • ... 'Shishir Kushwaha 5-Yr IDD: Mathematical Sci.s, IIT(BHU)' via sympy
                • ... Mohit Kumar
      • ... ABHISHEK KUMAR

Reply via email to