On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 08:58 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 10:54 +0100, Mark Ellis wrote: > > > Indeed, this is the way to go for config files in general. What I meant > > was I can't see anywhere a system file would be useful for sync-engine, > > it's all very user specific (except opensync version, see below). I > > suppose of course it wouldn't hurt to make allowance for one anyway. > > Yeah, I take that point, although I could argue that in some cases you > might want to make a site-wide change to AuthMethod. And, of course, > other settings may be added in future that need sitewide changes. It's > just good practice and doesn't really hurt anything.
I'm just discovering how much I miss autoconf and the C preprocessor :) Python has grown on me lately, but the trouble with this is taht you have to make certain assumptions about the install system that I wouldn't dream of doing in C. Anyway, apart from that, I've nearly got a patch for this, just needs a bit of a test. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
