Hello, thanks for your replies!
On 21.07.2011 10:39, Patrick Ohly wrote: >>> SyncEvolution supports MeeGo and is preinstalled on the Netbook images >>> but seems to be not available on Harmattan? >> >> Hmm. Interesting. I had assumed SyncEvolution would be available on >> Harmattan. > > No, Nokia wanted to use their own solution, Buteo. > > Roman, I haven't followed what Nokia did with Buteo in Harmattan. Which > SyncML servers does it support? Hmmm, how can I find out? Besides mail for exchange it allows to add an CalDAV account. Is this a SyncML protocol that'd allow me to sync to a Funambol server? If yes, it is only for calendar, I suppose? Besides there exists a sync functionality (I guess this is Buteo?) that just allows syncing via Bluetooth. I used this successfully to sync with my N900. >>> Are there plans to support Harmattan? >> >> I suppose you might have to wait until I get a N9 - unless someone else >> does it first. (Or, I suppose, someone gives me their N950, but I won't >> be holding my breath waiting for that.) > > I have neither a N950 nor a N9 and no plans to compile SyncEvolution for > Harmattan myself. Is there something I can contribute to motivate you / accelerate this? Of course, I am more than available for any testing activities. Also, I am willing to contribute directly. I have programing skills but no experience with PIM or syncing, and MeeGo/Harmattan neither. >> I'm not sure. I took a look at some Harmattan docs, and it seems that >> calendar-backend may have been replaced with "mkcal". Perhaps >> SyncEvolution's existing kcalextended backend would work with mkcal. For >> contacts, I suspect they now use qtcontacts instead of ebook, so perhaps >> SyncEvolution's qtcontacts backend would also work. > > Both backends should indeed work with the PIM storages in Harmattan. > Initially, I wrote them to have some way of experimenting with these > storages, later the mKCal backend became relevant for a while for CalDAV > syncing in MeeGo. > > MeeGo no longer uses mKCal/QtContacts-Tracker, so both backends are > effectively unmaintained until someone picks them up again. If someone > does, I'd be happy to keep them in SyncEvolution. Kind regards, Roman _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
