On 16/11/16 08:43, Tino Mettler wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:16:29 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > [...] > >> while Buteo was a "cleanly designed" framework which avoided doing >> any of the hard work and delegated that to "plugins". In other >> words, it didn't actually solve the problems. > > OpenSync reloaded? :-)
Oooh, a bit of a low blow :-) I certainly learnt a lot from spending quite a lot of effort trying to make OpenSync work! The main one (and the main reason I am here) is that sync is **really** hard to do in the general case. Syncevolution does a great job on two-way sync but it would be really good to solve the multi-way problem one day :-) But that would require some significant work by a team who are willing to look at and learn from all the previous attempts. I sometimes wish Philippe Kahn had not lost interest in sync. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
