On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 07:31:26AM +1100, Darren Reed wrote: > Make sure the hash function is mentioned in the message somewhere! > i.e. <md5:abc719d0efb184c> Seems a good idea, about md5: after a "light" analisys seems that md5 possible weakness (compression function problem [see birthday attack] and length) aren't a problem with syslog messages. What do you think? (I want not start an md5 against sha1 thread ;) Also an issue against UDP: It's impossible to handle fragmentation problems with UDP since it's impossible to use path mtu discovery. antirez
