On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:16:55PM +0100, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > I assume the last sentence was mistyped, and you meant that > > the relay should send RFC3339-TIMESTAMP if it receives a > > message with RFC3339-TIMESTAMP > > I am sorry, yes, it was meant to be: > > === > If a relay receives a RFC3164-TIMESTAMP, it MUST forward the message > with a RFC3164-TIMESTAMP and similarly if a relay receives a > RFC3339-TIMESTAMP it MUST forward the message with a RFC3339-TIMESTAMP. > === > > > > > Btw, why is this a requirement a _MUST_? I think 'SHOULD' is > > perfectly enough, a relay can be smart enough to convert from > > RFC3164 to RFC3339 timestamps if configured this way. (for > > example tz information can be added, assuming the relay is in > > the same zone as the sender) > ==== > If a relay receives a RFC3164-TIMESTAMP, it SHOULD forward the message > with a RFC3164-TIMESTAMP but MAY reformat it to a RFC3339-TIMESTAMP if > configured to do so. If a relay receives a RFC3339-TIMESTAMP it MUST > forward the message with a RFC3339-TIMESTAMP. It MUST NOT reformat it to > a RFC3164-TIMESTAMP. > ====
it sounds fine to me. -- Bazsi PGP info: KeyID 9AF8D0A9 Fingerprint CD27 CFB0 802C 0944 9CFD 804E C82C 8EB1
