>>>>> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 21:21:34 +1300, Andrew Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
AR> I can see Rainer's point about deciding if a host has an accurate clock
AR> or not, but a quick look at the logs would show that every message from
AR> that host was stamped with 000 and therefore assume that it was not
AR> setting the value.
"Objection your honor, calls for a conclusion from the witness." :-)
AR> Could we pad it with NNN instead of SP SP SP or 000?
Perhaps "---", since we often use "-" to indicate missing stuff. But
pretty much anything that is an "out of badn", e.g. not a digit, would
be acceptable.
--tep
