Hi Darren, I don't know them well enough to comment. Are you willing to write one or two drafts proposing these as possible solutions so the WG can evaluate them as alternatives?
David Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 6:14 AM > To: Miao Fuyou > Cc: 'David Harrington'; 'Rainer Gerhards'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Syslog] Secure transport alternatives > > Miao Fuyou wrote: > > real "general" security mechanisms(except IPsec, but it is not > > application-friendly). So, IMHO the primary criteria for > selection is: is it > > convenient for the application to invoke the security > service provided by > > the security protocol? > > That to me sounds like GSSAPI or SASL. > > Any reason these aren't being considered ? > > -- > Darren J Moffat > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
