On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Thu, 28.11.13 09:39, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> > For the types that actually feel like primitive types (in contrast to >> > objects), we usually appended a libc style _t to our names. >> >> Ouh, libudev uses "udev_log_fn" so I followed that style. I thought >> that's what we use for callback-prototypes. Is that just a left-over >> from pre-systemd times? I can change it all to _t, if it is. > > udev does a couple of things differently i guess, since it predates the > rest of systemd. I mean, it is called "libudev", and not > "libsystemd-udev" after all... > > Kay keeps talking of replacing libudev by libsystemd-udev and doing a > bit of API clean-ups on the way, but I am not too convinced yet...
Yeah, talk is cheap. And if we do that, it would be libsystemd-device, and be fully based on kdbus and not netlink. But all that is for a time when we all are really bored. There is more important stuff to do at the moment. :) Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
