On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]> wrote: > This of course is reinventing the multipolygon but would it end up simpler? > For one advantage: you loose the requirements of proper rings. > And you'd have no trouble with seams and edges (because overlapping would be > OK).
Different yes, simpler not. You just move the complexity of managing/editing multipolygons to the complexity of managing/editing stacking numbers. Pieren _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
