On 09/01/2011 02:57 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
IMHO there is no "landuse" inside another landuse (at least for the
"true" landuses which are the landuses by man.
Do we agree that nested polygons replace, not supplement, the outer polygon?
The rendering seems cool with this, and it makes sense. If I draw a forest,
then draw a landuse=reservoir on top of it, those interested in the
forest's true area can subtract out the reservoir. No multipolgon
relation needed.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
