2011/9/2 Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]>: > On 9/2/2011 3:40 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: >> The rendering seems cool with this, and it makes sense. If I draw a >> forest, >> then draw a landuse=reservoir on top of it, those interested in the >> forest's true area can subtract out the reservoir. No multipolgon >> relation needed. > > I disagree with this example. First, landuse=reservoir is an abomination, > since it doesn't refer to land that is used for reservoir purposes, but only > to that which is normally covered by water. Second, the managed forest > generally does not extend all the way to the edge of the water.
+1, I also disagree. I see landuse=forest as the effective area covered by trees. Hence I would subtract all other entities within. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
