Hi.
Some remarks have been mentioned here already, why this proposal is not
well designed.
Another one is, that it's tackling the lanes-problem, but not solving it.
You propose something for turning lanes - but again restrict it to cars.
The talk page in the wiki contains a question about cycle lanes, that
has been rejected to be solved by the proposal.
To go a little step further, it's even worse for
sidewalks/footpaths/pavements, which are unsolved wether to tag as
separate lanes, tags at the street way or whatever.
I don't think, these unfinished proposals are a good idea in this case,
as long as they don't solve the multi-lane problem in general (or are at
least designed to be extendable to solve the problem).
Here I cannot see this extendability.
regards
Peter
Am 06.10.2011 08:17, schrieb Ilya Zverev:
Hi! Following discussions in this list and in couple of forum threads
(and since there are some eager nav software programmers that wish to
use the first proposal they see), I studied all of the proposals for
tagging turn lanes and made a compound tagging scheme, which is not
hard to use, but addresses mapping simplicity, presentation and
routing. Please check it, and I'd be glad to answer your questions
(but please use wiki talk page if possible: keeping mailing list
threads is hard when you receive messages in digests).
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Turn_Lanes
IZ
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
