Peter Wendorff wrote:
Some remarks have been mentioned here already, why this proposal is
not
well designed.
Another one is, that it's tackling the lanes-problem, but not solving
it.
You propose something for turning lanes - but again restrict it to
cars.
It was not my decision, but was the outcome of a recent discussion in
this very list:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2011-September/thread.html#8532
Proposed taging scheme just refines lanes tag value, not touching other
proposed and approved features.
To go a little step further, it's even worse for
sidewalks/footpaths/pavements, which are unsolved wether to tag as
separate lanes, tags at the street way or whatever.
I guess you should discuss that on the corresponding proposals pages,
for example,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Advanced_footway_and_cycleway
My opinion is that all sidewalks, cycleways and whatever should be
drawn as separate ways.
I don't think, these unfinished proposals are a good idea in this
case,
as long as they don't solve the multi-lane problem in general (or are
at
I don't think it's possible to solve all multi-lane problems, both
encountered and imaginary. And it's certainly not possible to make that
solution simple enough for potlatch users, for example. I took a part of
that problem that I could deal with, and formed a proposal. It is not
finished, because it's in RFC stage. But it's close enough.
IZ
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
