2012/4/23 Jason Cunningham <[email protected]>: > Problem with that, and why I am said this is far more complex than I first > thought, is some people responding to lanes=1.5 by saying 'computers' only > like whole numbers. This suggests width=4.3 would need to be rounded to > either width=4 or width=5 neither of which would help with solving the > lanes=1.5 problem, because 4m is to narrow for two 2.010m cars, and 5m > arguably doesn't require you to significantly slow down.
1) The "whole numbers" referred to the lanes tag. Width of course can have fractional digits. 2) The width=4 should be a recommendation if the width - for whatever reason - is not measured exactly. The recommend width should have two properties: a) easy to remember, and b) for any data consumer it should be clear, that this is "narrow". Because of a) I would take 4 and not 4.3 and because of b) we can not take 5. Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
