2012/4/23 Kytömaa Lauri <lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi>: > If one does not consider parked cars _at all_, the first example > of my previous post (at the end) with a 9 meter wide > carriageway and no markings would have to be lanes=3
Of course not. It would be lanes=2. The width isn't decisive for the lane count, but markings or usage. I doubt, that anyone would consider this to be a road with three lanes. >, but > it's not a three lane road. Likewise, this oneway street > (5.9-6.0 meters wide) with cars always on one side would have > to be lanes=2, which seems wrong, don't you think? Same argument as before. >>In my opinion, parked cars should not be considered. Keep it simple! >>The tag lanes should give you the number of lanes. The tag width gives >>you the width. And if cars usually park on the road, we should use a >>tag - maybe parking:lanes or similar - for that one. > > We already do use parking:lane:right/both/left=*, a lot. :) Perfect :-) Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging