If one does not consider parked cars _at all_, the first example of my previous post (at the end) with a 9 meter wide carriageway and no markings would have to be lanes=3, but it's not a three lane road. Likewise, this oneway street (5.9-6.0 meters wide) with cars always on one side would have to be lanes=2, which seems wrong, don't you think?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Parkingonstreetdedicatedlanes1oneway.png >In my opinion, parked cars should not be considered. Keep it simple! >The tag lanes should give you the number of lanes. The tag width gives >you the width. And if cars usually park on the road, we should use a >tag - maybe parking:lanes or similar - for that one. We already do use parking:lane:right/both/left=*, a lot. :) >> Urban road 9 meters wide (measured from aerial images), parked cars >> on one side (always), no markings. Definitively lanes=2 - that's 3,5 >> meter wide lanes, enough for the bus that runs here. >> http://g.co/maps/9pvjn -- Alv _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
