Am 26.04.2012 um 20:03 schrieb Jason Cunningham <jamicu...@googlemail.com>:
> Major problem: You've haven't adequately dealt with the lanes=1.5 issue. > You've suggested something that can't solve the issue, but simply looks like > an attempt to cleanse it from the lanes tag and forget about it. Actually I thought it was solved by specifying the width. And I can't cleanse it from the database by - for the first time as far as I can see - mention lanes=1.5 in the wiki. > Major Problem: The Assumptions section, I think, is a very bad idea. The > 'Remark' for everything other than motorways/trunk suggests not to add the > lane data, but rely on the assumption. If you do not know how many lanes are > present the Assumptions table is good idea to what might be present. But > surveyed data is superior to an assumption, and we must not encourage people > not to add the data. In the remarks I wrote "... is usually not tagged...", which afaik is the truth. I also had the impression, that we don't want the lanes-tag on every residential road. If this is not the case I could remove the "none" from the residential-road-example and rephrase the assumptions. Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
