Richard Welty <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/25/13 5:17 PM, Balaitous wrote: > > Hi, > > I have wrote a proposition of classification for path. > > You can see it at : > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/pathtype > > > given the descriptions on the proposal page, how would you categorize > this path: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=38.299921&lon=-77.708957&zoom=18&layers=M > > it is a loop trail at a historic tour stop, it travels through the > woods > to several points of > interest on the Wilderness Battlefield and returns to the original > parking area. it is well > maintained, defined by a rubberized surface, and is intended > specifically for use on foot. > > i'd think grade 1 or 2 based on maintenance, but it's short and > doesn't > entirely fit in the > rest of the definition. > > richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Also, the proposed path types would classify any path that ends in a cul-de-sac as the least-used and least-maintained category, which isn't necessarily the case. -- John F. Eldredge -- [email protected] "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
