> i think i'll summarize thusly: the proposal tries to combine distinctly > different concepts into one tag, and the result is a simple taxonomy > that sort of looks ok but doesn't handle a bunch of real world cases > very well.
It's a good summary of my proposition. But where you think combine different concepts led a poor quality information, I think it brings more value. You can do a classification by statistics algorithms, and it would be very interesting for research work, but it will never aggregate all subjectives criteria which make a path more important than an other. It's the difference between a computer and a humain brain. I don't know if my definitions are good (and you can modifie them), but I am sure it is useful. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
