On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote: > fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com> writes: > > > But how to we proceed ? > > > > If we agree that landuse=reservoir should be used for the whole area. Do > > we need a temporary tag or adding water=reservoir to all of them? > > > > Only simple case are where a water=reservoir is already tagged (either > > on the same object or within one. > > Having been away from this for a bit, I would propose: > > Add a landuse=reservoir_protection (or some other name, not in use) to > be for the landuse of a parcel that is used for containing a reservoir > and protection zones. (I have an attitude that landuse will often > align with parcel boundaries.) > > Let landuse=reservoir be deprecated, because it's confusing. > > Let water=reservoir be used, because it is not confusing. That tag > denots the fact that the area is a) water and b) a reservoir, which is > object tagging, not landuse tagging. >
+1 I agree that landuse=reservoir is confusing and we should use a different tag for the water itself and a different tag that includes the surrounding land area. Whether that land area is a landuse=* or not is something we all still need to agree on.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging