2013/11/5 Pieren <[email protected]> > I'm surprised you still have such questions in Germany. Your > description is not clear since you don't explain what is on the way > and what is on the relation. >
it shouldn't matter. Mostly you don't need a relation at all (if not to reduce redundancy by overlapping ways), as long as there aren't enclaves/exclaves involved. Actually the ways don't have to be any tags at all (IMHO), but boundary=administrative surely helps to reduce destruction by mappers with less capable editors (those that don't expose relations). > But I can tell how it *should* be : on > the boudary way : put the highest admin level (thus, with the lowest > numerical number). And create one relation per admin_level, obviously. > for which admin levels? For all admin levels there would be if it wasn't an exception? If they are admin_level=6 and there is no 8 in this case? There is a similar case with Bremen, Hamburg and Berlin, which are level 4 (and 6 and 5?). I'd also use distinct relations for admin_level=6 and 4 in this case, but this is disputed in the German comunity. > > For the "county free big city", simply don't create a relation with > admin_level 6 but keep only the one exclusively for admin_level 8. > -1, as they are at the same level as a county (or Berlin/Hamburg/Bremen is at the same level as a "Bundesland") they should definitely be admin_level=4 (or 6 in Flos example), but the question is if we should also make a relation with admin_level=6 or 8. IMHO yes. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
