On 04.04.2014 17:35, Pieren wrote: > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira <nao...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> If it is accepted, I gonna hange the wiki accordingly and gonna ask a >>> for validator checks in JOSM, as we have more than 100,000 ways with >>> this tag. >> Basically I agree with the current text of >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit (except that I don't >> agree to use it on ways). > > As I understood, the "noexit=yes" means "this way is a cul-de-sac". > What is unclear if the tag is on the last node or on the way itself ? > It is still a cul-de-sac...
Think this is a misinterpretation. > It seems that 40% of the "noexit=yes" tags are on ways and are > understandable by their contributors but 100% of the persons writing > on this thread do not understand what 40% of the contributors do ... > So, instead of trying to change 40% of the contributors with wiki > fiddling and josm obscure validations, you should try to open a bit > your mind and accept that contributors can supply the same information > in different ways (or nodes ;-). Stay open like "Open"StreetMap ;-) We do not need this tag to tag a cul-de-sac. There are other ways as even the geometrie and connected ways give you this information. If you want to tag the sign that is fine, please use traffic_sign=*. I am trying to find reasons why it is used that much on ways and if it is useful but you are the first one in favour of ways. If you have a look at the wiki history you will find wiki fiddling some years ago, later the activism on the page was little. I am still looking for good reasons to use it on ways but I did not find any so far. Please, tell me if you know some. Cheers fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
