Hm hm, somebody could not wait to start the page ;-) I went through the mail thread so far, and tried to populate the Talk page with some of the arguments, please add if I missed a point. Maybe Martin could add some arguments why =public_administration should be preferred?
tom Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2014-11-04 11:06: > I'm opposing "civil" or "civic" by the definitions you cited above, [...] > What about using more specific definitions, e.g. landuse=public_administration? johnw wrote on 2014-11-04 03:56:
Assembling a draft page. it is my first "draft page", so my syntax is kinda crap.
> I will be working on the details of the proposal later today.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dcivic Javbw On Nov 4, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfei...@computer.org> wrote:ok, now we have landuse={governmental|public_administrative|civic|civil|public} For my taste, public implies much more openness than we have from some ministries, immigration offices etc, but is certainly a value to consider. I would like to put a RFC page together towards the end of the week, so it would be nice it the other contributors to this discussion would indicate under which title we should start it. tom
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
