On Fri Nov 07 2014 07:30:30 GMT+0000 (GMT), Colin Smale wrote: > > > I would not expect the landuse value of the municipal bus company's HQ > to change if the bus company was privatised... Only the ownership will > have changed, nothing else. Actually, as the buildings are probably > leased from a property company anyway, even that would stay the same. > Just the shareholders of the company would different. > > So I would suggest "civic" or "government" or whatever should only be > applied where the activities taking place there are actually "civic > administration" - council meetings, committees, births/deaths/marriages, > highways,..... i.e. the core business of a local authority as defined in > law. Sidelines like running transport companies or sports grounds are > not "landuse=civic" to my mind. +1
I totally agree Colin, it would be equally ridiculous to tag schools or parks as civic. Phil (trigpoint ) -- Sent from my Jolla _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
