Einverstanden :) Please vote: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/water_tap#Voting
Cheers, Kotya On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Friedrich Volkmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04.12.2014 10:31, Kotya Karapetyan wrote: > > For me, English common sense says a 'water source' could be a river, > > lake, spring etc... > > the portability of water is not a measure of its source (where it > comes > > from) but its purity... > > > > So I'd think the key should be > > > > Water_purity with the key values 'potable', 'nonpotable' and > 'unknown' > > ('yes' does not imply anything in the context of water purity nor > water > > source). > > > > That key can be added to rives, lakes, drinking fountains etc etc .. > no > > changes are required for present tags. Simply the additional > information > > can be added. > > > > > > Warin, I don't know if you followed the discussion and saw the proposal > in > > the wiki. > > In short, it all started with the lack of good option to map a source of > > non-potable water, like a water tap. It evolved from there to the current > > state. The proposal from the last email reflects to ~90 % everything > > suggested as the discussion proceeded. > > In German, we have a verb "verschlimmbessern", which means to make > something > worse by improving it. I agree with Warin that water_source=potable does > not > seem right. It mixes source (origin) and target (use). water_source=* may > be > fine with another set of values, and *=potable may be fine with another key > (drinkable=* and drinking_water=* are in use, and water:quality=* and > water_purity=* were suggested in this discussion). > > -- > Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ > Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
