Now you're insulting the one person who was supporting you? Please
STOP this thread everyone. Please.

2015-01-21 8:55 GMT+00:00 Никита <acr...@gmail.com>:
>> Just because one can use a regular expression to grep out a certain
>> meaning doesn't mean it's a good thing to do and will always work
> We easily revert these edits in Russia. Quite often user who want to show
> their regex fu will fail so hard to guess actual properly of the real world.
>
> We care about data we map.
> We document it instead of guessing by taginfo.
> We use real tags instead of regexes for users.
>
> We like our newbies. We don't want to insist to use f$#$g perl regexes
> simply to map things around them.
>
> I cannot stop you from using regex. But if I find your changsets erroneous I
> will revert them.
>
>> In fact, nobody forces us to only use yes and no as a value.
> Wrong. It not forces you anything. You can still tag currency:X=fixme.
>
>> The Healthcare 2.0 proposal uses partial, main, yes and no. This can
>> easily applied to a lot of values where it makes sense and it gives the
>> flexibility to distinguish between equal and distinguished importance .
> There way more tagging schemes than single Healthcare 2.0. Yes there
> differences, so what?
>
>> Using semicolon-lists for values was always considered a crutch until a
>> better tagging-scheme comes along.
> You forgot to say "among English speaking users who fail to use JOSM search
> funtion or overpass or taginfo or wiki documentation". I don't care about
> them.
>
>> We all know that the only real solution would be a native data type for
>> arrays in the database but as long as this isn't happening, we have to work
>> around.
> And obviously you choose the worst way to do this. With complicating things
> with REGEX.
>
>
> 2015-01-21 11:42 GMT+03:00 Nadjita <tagg...@mark.reidel.info>:
>>
>> On 21.01.2015 09:06, Никита wrote:
>>
>> > If you trying to parse name=school *with any regex *to map it as
>> > amenity=school* *you are wrong. OSM is not for you.
>> > If you trying to parse currency=bitcoin;coin for coin, then stop it
>> > right now. You have no idea how regexes or tags in osm work.
>>
>> While I think, you should really calm down a bit and not sound so
>> aggressive, I have to agree with you. The purpose of structuring data is
>> not having to use a complicated, but a simple parser. Just because one
>> can use a regular expression to grep out a certain meaning doesn't mean
>> it's a good thing to do and will always work.
>> The only downside of currency:X=yes, currency:Y=yes to currency=X;Y is
>> that it involves more typing. In fact, nobody forces us to only use yes
>> and no as a value. The Healthcare 2.0 proposal uses partial, main, yes
>> and no. This can easily applied to a lot of values where it makes sense
>> and it gives the flexibility to distinguish between equal and
>> distinguished importance .
>> Using semicolon-lists for values was always considered a crutch until a
>> better tagging-scheme comes along.
>> We all know that the only real solution would be a native data type for
>> arrays in the database but as long as this isn't happening, we have to
>> work around.
>> But please let's not drag this down to a personal level and start
>> insulting each other, this isn't going to accomplish anything but anger.
>>
>> - Nadjita
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to