Not me. Oh, that was a rethorical question. Polyglot
2015-01-24 1:07 GMT+01:00 Christian Quest <[email protected]>: > > Le 22/01/2015 22:49, Johan C a écrit : > > Good to have this discussion. From a computer expert point-of-view > > relations are fantastic for data integrity and to keep database size > > low. From an OSM point-of-view, which includes being friendly towards > > novice users, relations should be avoided whenever possible. And > > associatedStreet relations are avoidable. > > A novice user will hardly break an associatedStreet relation, but will > more often break addr:* when updating a streetname without updating > related addresses. > It is much harder to detect the second at the QA level. > > If simplicity is our new mantra, who will be the first propose to > deprecate the public_transport relation based tagging scheme ? > > -- > Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
