Would it not be ok to say (eg) - tourism=camp_site camp_site=basic backcountry=yes
That's exactly what I was proposing. It isn't a tag describing the amenities of the camp so much as to indicate that it is a certain type of camp, one not accessible by vehcles. In New Zealand I believe these would be called trekking sites. I have no experience with Australia but I'm guessing the term would mean the same thing. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Am 21.04.2015 um 00:27 schrieb David Bannon <dban...@internode.on.net>: > > > > Dave, do you think that the characteristics of 'backcountry' overlap > > with the more generic 'basic' ? > > > isn't this something describing the general context rather than a > particular attribute to a distinct feature? Do these have common properties > you can't find in different context? If it is the first, I'd rather not use > a tag for it as you can get this information from the map itself and there > won't be a hard definition for it > > cheers > Martin -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
