Am 24.07.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Hubert: > But only the way with the traffic sign will be tagged with > bicycle=designated, foot=designated using the definition in the > description box > > That is not logical, because both ways are still equally designated to > pedestrians and cyclist in both situations.
Today in OSM it's documented, only the ways signposted with a traffic sign should be tagged with *=designated (as described on the cited page access=designated and much more). Now you'd like to apply the tag *=designated also to ways which are constructional intended for the specific traffic but without a traffic sign, right? I object this due to the reasons: - this is changing an existing tag definition, it's not downwardly compatible (designated would then no longer mean "signposted") - it will therefore lose the possibility to distinguish between ways what are signposted and that what are not. To tag ways without a signpost like in your example I'd recommend just the generic tags like bicycle=yes, foot=yes and segregated=yes if appropriate. Propably describe details with width:lanes=* or similar. Best regards, Heiko _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging