On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 06:17:52AM -0700, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Alan McConchie wrote: > > access=no is absolutely a core tag within OSM, dating back to the very first > iteration of Map Features. It isn't "easily ignored". Any router which > ignores it is unambiguously bugged. Any renderer intended for walkers' > consumption which shows it as a walkable path is unambiguously bugged. > > We began with highway=footway/bridleway/cycleway/track, surface=*, and > access/foot/bicycle/horse/motor_vehicle=*. With these values, you can model > the essential characteristic of 95% of paths (conservative estimate). > > The best way to map these, without adding further burdens to mappers or > consumers, is to use broad-brush, well-established tags such as: > > highway=footway > access=no > > and then, if you feel this doesn't fully capture your particular edge case, > some sort of _additional_ tag: > > social_path=yes > +1 ael
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
