That means it's flawed, not subjective. So give it a few sources, and they will more or less cancel each others flaws.
Recording crime rate is not an exact science, so of course it can never be perfect. But perfect is the enemy of good enough. Janko sub, 19. stu 2016. u 12:53 Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> napisao je: On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, 20:44 Paul Johnson, <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: Don't. Too subjective, and tends to highlight some kinds of bigotry while basically giving a pass to other kinds. How is it subjective if you take data from the local police? Very. Portland Police, for example, have a policy of not taking reports if nobody gets sent to the hospital or the crime isn't a felony in an effort to keep the city's crime stats artificially low. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
