Thanks for bringing this up, I just opened a ticket with OSRM to track this: https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/3325
We're more than happy to support your idea of taking dangerous areas / hazards into account when routing once we can parse it from the data. Cheers, Daniel J H On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote: > It's the second time that we are having a major discussion here in > Brazil, on how to tag highways located in "dangerous" areas. > For example, some people consider slums and other communities as > dangerous (since there is a risk of being robbed or even killed) and > would like to don't have the router creating a route through them, > using "access=destination" in every street located in such places for > this, for example. > > Since they can't find another tag to indicate those "dangerous" > places, they argue that access=destination is valid for this case. > > Other group (including me) find that this is wrong: we should not tag > streets considered dangerous in OSM (specially when "dangerous" is > subjective). > We also think that access=destination is being wrongly used for this. > > Since we can't reach a consensus on this, we would like to hear some > opinions and suggestions on how to handle such problem, please. > > I had one idea where such data should be kept outside OSM, and > inserted in some post-processing phase (for example, tag every highway > that is inside these areas with any needed/wanted property). > > Comments, please? > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
