Rory, I understand the rationale behind what you say but that still doesn't offer a viable solution to the roadway. I think it would make sense to at least tag the center "lane". On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:27 AM Rory McCann <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/02/17 21:56, Mark Wagner wrote: > > I'd consider mapping it as a dual carriageway. I don't know what the > > law is in Pennsylvania, but here in Idaho, a doubled double-yellow > > line is the legal equivalent of a physical barrier: you are not allowed > > to drive across it for any reason. > > Umm... you shouldn't do this. The rule in OSM is that if you cannot > physically drive between the lanes, you should use 2 OSM ways. if you > can physically do it, then use one OSM way (even if that would be illegal). > > There are plenty of roads in OSM which you cannot legally drive across > it (in IE/UK an unbroken white line in the middle), which are mapped as > one single OSM way. > > You should maintain the OSM convention of single way implies they > "physicallity" of driving across, and says nothing about the legality of > that. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- *C/CMSgt Dominic Coletti, CAP* First Sergeant, Raleigh-Wake Composite Squadron (H) 919-463-9554 U.S. Air Force Auxiliary GoCivilAirPatrol.com <http://www.gocivilairpatrol.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/pages/Civil-Air-Patrol/107647995924164> <http://instagram.com/civil__air__patrol> <https://twitter.com/civilairpatrol> <https://www.flickr.com/photos/civilairpatrol/sets/>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
