On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Mark Wagner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'd consider mapping it as a dual carriageway. I don't know what the > > law is in Pennsylvania, but here in Idaho, a doubled double-yellow > > line is the legal equivalent of a physical barrier: you are not allowed > > to drive across it for any reason. > > I would keep dual carriage way mapping for the cases with real > physical barriers (such as guard rails or kerbs) or different surfaces > (grass). > IMHO, you loose valuable information by not mentioning there is a > third lane in the middle. > Emergency vehicles might want to know this, planning of very wide load > transports might want to know this. Governments might need this > information, so they know they can divert traffic over the middle lane > in case of road works. > There might be other applications that find this information valuable. > This tends to be my line of thinking as well.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
