Am 14.07.2017 um 14:32 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2017-07-14 10:16 GMT+02:00 Tobias Wrede <l...@tobias-wrede.de
<mailto:l...@tobias-wrede.de>>:
Have a look at this place "Siesel":
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.22209/7.90369
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.22209/7.90369>. The
hamlet is called Siesel and officially all the streets there do
not have a name (you can check on the "NRW-Atlas: ALKIS" layer
that all streets are just designated "Weg" i. e. "Street"). From
an official address point of view all houses there should have
addr:place=Siesel and addr:housenumber=nn.
is "nn" meant to be literally the string "nn"? (btw: NN in German
usage is a placeholder referring to people). In Italy, quite
frequently in the countryside, there is the abbreviation "snc" to say
"no housenumber", but I wouldn't add this in addr:housenumber as it's
not a housenumber (you can find it in official lists in the
housenumber field though).
Na. "nn" is meant to be a placeholder for the actual number: 12, 13, 14
etc.
On the ground, tough, they have put up the usual German street
name signs all showing "Siesel". So from an on the ground point of
view all houses there should have addr:street=Siesel and
addr:housenumber=nn. What to do now?
it's by definition we refuse to have both tags, as addr:place is
defined for places without streetnames
Well that's the question here, isn't it? Is it by definition or not?
Tobi
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
