On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 9:23 PM, Nick Bolten <nbol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree that capacity:*=yes isn't as information-rich, it's just the > convention listed on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key: > capacity. > Not the convention but A convention. More precisely, an option: capacity:disabled=yes/no/number. > I suppose it could help communicate different certainties in mapping. > There is *some* value in knowing > whether any spaces are available, versus the exact number. > There's a benefit to knowing if there are/are not disabled spaces available rather than not knowing at all. But if you know the number it's far better to use that rather than "yes." Combining `capacity:disabled=5` with `capacity:disabled:ramp=4` would imply > that 1 disabled parking space doesn't have dedicated room for a van ramp, > if I understand your question right. > That was what I had in mind. Because capacity:disabled=5 and capacity:disabled:ramp=yes would imply they all have room for a ramp, which may not be the case (and it's probably better to give the number for ramps anyway, so there is no ambiguity). Leaving room for a ramp means less room for parking in general, so you might get 5 disabled spaces and only 2 with room for ramps. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
