> On Jun 11, 2018, at 1:17 PM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> > wrote: > 11. Jun 2018 13:09 by bhou...@gmail.com <mailto:bhou...@gmail.com>: > But for right now, can we get that page taken down so people stop tagging it, > and have a proper proposal put up and accepted? > I added > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features%2Ftransit&type=revision&diff=1617128&oldid=1617122 > > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/transit&type=revision&diff=1617128&oldid=1617122> Thank you!
> While iD design may exclude flooding user with warnings - why its rendering > suggests that for example [building=yes; demolished=yes] is a good idea? > I already told you why here: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4501#issuecomment-393726776 <https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4501#issuecomment-393726776> Any feature with any kind of ephemeral tag gets drawn with dashes. iD also have a special rendering for old style multipolygons, so people can clean them up if they want to. Rendering something with dashes doesn’t mean we are encouraging people to tag a certain way - it just means “hey mapper, pay attention to this thing, there is something interesting about it”. Please start a separate discussion thread if you want to discuss lifecycle tagging. Thanks, Bryan
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
