On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Dolly Andriatsiferana < privatemaj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I like the idea of keeping a namespace gathering utilities such as > electricity, gas, internet or other. But the idea is also to be able to use > a namespace for the utility to provide more details (source, voltage, > fee...) or conditions (if there's schedule in availability) - and with > *utility:electricity* this would easily generate a complex tagging of > namespace under namespace, unless you say it is no problem to have > *utility:electricity:voltage=** for example. > Note that there may be potential [heh] conflicts with existing tagging schemes and existing proposals. Not just power_supply (mentioned earlier in the thread) but car charging https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station and camping sites https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site It would be nice if, as far as possible, there is an attempt at consistency of terminology when addressing certain concepts such as voltage, frequency and current rating. Also whether a supply is permanent (as in a house) or uses a power receptacle (such as at a car charging station or a camping site). It would be a good idea to allow mappers to specify the earthing system used (if known) using IEC terminology. So TN, TN-S, TN-C, TN-CS, TT, IT, etc. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
