On 31/08/18 05:20, François Lacombe wrote:
Le jeu. 30 août 2018 à 19:12, Dolly Andriatsiferana
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
I like the idea of keeping a namespace gathering utilities such as
electricity, gas, internet or other. But the idea is also to be
able to use a namespace for the utility to provide more details
(source, voltage, fee...) or conditions (if there's schedule in
availability) - and with *utility:electricity* this would easily
generate a complex tagging of namespace under namespace, unless
you say it is no problem to have
*utility:electricity:voltage=** for example.
I think this would be hard to maintain, and highly redundant since
voltage won't change for a given city or even country.
Most hoses in Australia have 240 v single phase supplied to them. Then
they have 'standard' (here) GPOs of 10 Amp capacity. Some have one or
more higher 15 Amp capacity outlets.
And then there are some houses that have 3 phase 415v supplied to them -
and they have 'standard' (here) GPOs of 10 Amp capacity, possibly one or
more 15 Amp capacity outlets and one or more 3 phase outlets.
So here you have in one neighbourhood 3 different instances of
electricity presence in houses.
Agreed with Paul statement about earthing system which is specific to
each building
Earthing systems are usually mandated and common to some bureaucratic
boundaries.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
