sent from a phone
> On 12. Oct 2018, at 09:13, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why not bet both ways? > Make both a site and a group relation. why not a multipolygon? I agree that you don’t need additional tags for a group relation, just type=group, a name and the members, but for a site you would need something that describes the site, a tag for a group of water areas, so as long as all the members are areas (or parts), a multipolygon would be better. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
