17. Oct 2018 11:30 by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com <mailto:marc_marc_...@hotmail.com>:
> Le 17. 10. 18 à 10:50, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : >> 16. Oct 2018 09:47 by >> fl.infosrese...@gmail.com >> <mailto:fl.infosrese...@gmail.com>>> >> I'm still opposed to minor_line since in merge several different >> concept in one value, and is only useful for rendering >> >> power=line/power=minor_line is useful for both mappers and data users not >> interested in the extreme detail > > if you don't care about extreme detail one power=line is better :) > you see a line, tag a line in stead of guessing if it's a minor or not. > In my case I am interested in differentiating major power lines and minor power lines without further details. Given power=liner and power=minor_line scheme existed before I joined OSM and is really popular I guess that I am not alone. There are certainly (as with everything else) things that may be reasonably tagged as both line and minor_line but nearly always it is blatantly obvious and no deliberations are required.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
