Hi, i found some changesets downgrading streets to unclassified. After some discussions the mapper were under the impression that unclassified is something higher priority than residential.
From my long tagging practice in OSM unclassified and residential are identical in respect to priority. (And e.g. OSRM treats them equal) The first is used as a connecting road off city limits. The latter is used for the lowest class roads within city boundarys (Where there is residential usage) So for me retagging residential to unclassified is broken under the assumption that unclassified is something "better" than residential. It is even more broken when there is residential usage in which case unclassified is inappropriate. While discussing i found that there was some modification to the German version of unclassified not saying that unclassified is something "better" but suggesting that an unclassified should be dragged into city limits until the next higher class street. This lets user assume that unclassified is some higher priority than residential. I was treating those streets identical for the last 10+ years and only the city limits gave the indication whether to use unclassified or residential. Am i wrong with that usage? Flo -- Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging