... furthermore, highway_level can be used to classify footway or cycleway :)
For example, in a park, some footway are “unclassified” (or highway_level=5) and some are “primary” (or highway_level=1). Very useful to render long-range trail. djakk Le dim. 24 févr. 2019 à 15:44, djakk djakk <[email protected]> a écrit : > ... for the unclassified / residential issue : highway_level=5 or 6 and > highway_physics=countryside or town > > > djakk > > > Le dim. 24 févr. 2019 à 15:25, djakk djakk <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> Hello ! >> >> I think we should decorrelate the attributes of a road : its >> administrative class, its importance in the road network (at least 5 >> levels), its physical characteristics (motorway-like, two large lanes, >> link=yes ...), possibly its traffic characteristics. >> >> So we can tag a secondary motorway or a primary road through a >> residential area or an official motorway with pedestrians actually walking >> on it. >> >> So that we’ll unify osm road classification through the world (remember >> the highway=trunk issue ;-)) >> >> >> Julien “djakk” >> >> >> >> Le sam. 23 févr. 2019 à 16:49, Andy Townsend <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> On 23/02/2019 15:35, Greg Troxel wrote: >>> > ... But we don't have >>> > primary_residential >>> > primary_not_residential >>> > >>> > even though in the US that makes just as much sense as >>> > level5_residential and level5_not_residential. >>> >>> OSM sort-of did have that a very long time ago. The "abutters" key was >>> used for something like that (see >>> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/abutters ) but even when I >>> started (in 2008) I don't remember being told to use that key. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
