Hello ! So I have written something on the wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Djakk/new_tagging_scheme_for_roads
It is not definitive, feel free to add new ideas or to criticize ;) Julien “djakk” Le lun. 25 févr. 2019 à 11:36, djakk djakk <[email protected]> a écrit : > I meant “road for hgv” not “road for hybrid” ^^ > > Julien “djakk” > > > Le lun. 25 févr. 2019 à 11:35, djakk djakk <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> I forgot to mention that there are several kind of road to class : >> footway, cycleway, road for cars, road for hybrid, road for psv ;) >> >> Julien “djakk” >> >> >> Le lun. 25 févr. 2019 à 10:55, Erkin Alp Güney <[email protected]> >> a écrit : >> >>> Service roads would be highway=service as it is now. >>> >>> road_level tag also solves non-primary motorway tagging (motorroad, >>> autovia, non-expressway freeway, Polish S-road, Russian limited access >>> A-road etc.). You would tag a non-primary motorway as highway=motorway >>> road_level=<nonzero>. >>> >>> 25.02.2019 00:20 tarihinde Graeme Fitzpatrick yazdı: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 00:27, djakk djakk <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hello ! >>> > >>> > I think we should decorrelate the attributes of a road : its >>> > administrative class, its importance in the road network (at least >>> > 5 levels), its physical characteristics (motorway-like, two large >>> > lanes, link=yes ...), possibly its traffic characteristics. >>> > >>> > So we can tag a secondary motorway or a primary road through a >>> > residential area or an official motorway with pedestrians actually >>> > walking on it. >>> > >>> > So that we’ll unify osm road classification through the world >>> > (remember the highway=trunk issue ;-)) >>> > >>> > >>> > I could see that working! >>> > >>> > Replace the existing highway= types (=motorway; =primary etc) with >>> > highway=1 to =5?, with 1 being the existing =motorway, down to 5 being >>> > all the minor streets in a town. >>> > >>> > If you have a look >>> > at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/-28.0643/153.4191 (& I'm >>> > pretty sure everywhere around the World will look fairly similar?), >>> > the pink Pacific Motorway (=motorway) would become =1; the orange / >>> > tan major arterial roads (=primary: 2; 3; 7; 40; 50) =2; yellow >>> > connecting roads (=secondary) =3; white roads through suburbs >>> > (=tertiary) =4; all the grey minor roads (=residential / >>> > unclassified): residential in the suburbs, commercial areas in the >>> > CBD, roads inside industrial areas etc =5. >>> > >>> > Would you need =6 for service roads (driveways, parking lanes etc), or >>> > would they stay as the current=service designation? >>> > >>> > Setting levels like this & rendering them this way, would also get rid >>> > of the problem of roads not being visible in remote areas because a >>> > "secondary" road won't render - even if it's only hard-packed dirt, it >>> > would still be the level 1 or 2 road in this area! >>> > >>> > Feasible? >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > >>> > Graeme >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
