I forgot to mention that there are several kind of road to class : footway, cycleway, road for cars, road for hybrid, road for psv ;)
Julien “djakk” Le lun. 25 févr. 2019 à 10:55, Erkin Alp Güney <[email protected]> a écrit : > Service roads would be highway=service as it is now. > > road_level tag also solves non-primary motorway tagging (motorroad, > autovia, non-expressway freeway, Polish S-road, Russian limited access > A-road etc.). You would tag a non-primary motorway as highway=motorway > road_level=<nonzero>. > > 25.02.2019 00:20 tarihinde Graeme Fitzpatrick yazdı: > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 00:27, djakk djakk <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hello ! > > > > I think we should decorrelate the attributes of a road : its > > administrative class, its importance in the road network (at least > > 5 levels), its physical characteristics (motorway-like, two large > > lanes, link=yes ...), possibly its traffic characteristics. > > > > So we can tag a secondary motorway or a primary road through a > > residential area or an official motorway with pedestrians actually > > walking on it. > > > > So that we’ll unify osm road classification through the world > > (remember the highway=trunk issue ;-)) > > > > > > I could see that working! > > > > Replace the existing highway= types (=motorway; =primary etc) with > > highway=1 to =5?, with 1 being the existing =motorway, down to 5 being > > all the minor streets in a town. > > > > If you have a look > > at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/-28.0643/153.4191 (& I'm > > pretty sure everywhere around the World will look fairly similar?), > > the pink Pacific Motorway (=motorway) would become =1; the orange / > > tan major arterial roads (=primary: 2; 3; 7; 40; 50) =2; yellow > > connecting roads (=secondary) =3; white roads through suburbs > > (=tertiary) =4; all the grey minor roads (=residential / > > unclassified): residential in the suburbs, commercial areas in the > > CBD, roads inside industrial areas etc =5. > > > > Would you need =6 for service roads (driveways, parking lanes etc), or > > would they stay as the current=service designation? > > > > Setting levels like this & rendering them this way, would also get rid > > of the problem of roads not being visible in remote areas because a > > "secondary" road won't render - even if it's only hard-packed dirt, it > > would still be the level 1 or 2 road in this area! > > > > Feasible? > > > > Thanks > > > > Graeme > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
