On 06/03/19 18:52, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
On 3/6/19 6:00 AM, Warin wrote:
So .. what is the best way to map them?
My proposal would be a straightforward main tags chain to describe the
physical landmark features - and then all the extra sauce specialists
might want, but in a way that won't complicate the basics. So...
man_made=antenna
antenna=dish (or monopole/dipole/yagi/helical/phased_array ...)
Err No.
A 'dish' is a reflector to the antenna .. the antenna might be a dipole,
a horn etc.
While it is common to call an antenna a dish, tagging it as
'antenna=dish' means you cannot add 'antenna=dipole'.
Rather than antenna=dish it would be better to have dish=yes.
However this may complicate adding it to man_made=telescope,
telescope:type=radio as dish=yes does not mention antenna?
and then radio aficionados may add as much of
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/antenna:use as
they want (so we would amend this proposal to make it a complement to
the physical landmark features main tags).
Yes.. that is the intention of the proposal - it is a sub tag to
something else (that is an antenna).
It does presently say it is a 'property key' and that should imply that
it describes another key?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
