Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If this seems viable, I would expand the proposal by a migration proposal > > from amenity=police to police=station > > I don’t think we should abandon amenity=police and it will likely not happen > unless people tag so many different things with the tag that it becomes > useless. My primary interest is in specifying the kind of police and > facility, a generic amenity=police on top of that does not harm. If the new > scheme becomes so widespread that every police station also has a more > specific police=* tag, we can still decide to remove the amenity=police tags.
+1 amenity=police + police=* is a established way of refining the tagging. There is no need to abandon amenity=police for public facing police stations. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
