Mar 15, 2019, 7:37 AM by [email protected]: > > > Am 15. März 2019 00:19:22 MEZ schrieb althio <> [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> >: > >Martin Koppenhoefer <> [email protected] > ><mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > >>> > If this seems viable, I would expand the proposal by a migration >>> > >proposal from amenity=police to police=station > >>> >>> I don’t think we should abandon amenity=police and it will likely not >>> > >happen unless people tag so many different things with the tag that it > >becomes useless. My primary interest is in specifying the kind of > >police and facility, a generic amenity=police on top of that does not > >harm. If the new scheme becomes so widespread that every police station > >also has a more specific police=* tag, we can still decide to remove > >the amenity=police tags. > > That sounds reasonable. So we'd keep amenity=police as the general indicator > of police facilities > Public-facing police facilities. For example police warehouse should not be tagged with it (and even if some are tagged this way I think that everybody would consider it as a tagging mistake). > and use police=* as a sub-tag to specify the type of facility. > It should be noted that it can be used also without amenity=police for non-public facilities. > amenity=police would be reduced to indicate that the tag is used for all > police facilities > I am against changing meaning of an established tag (even if it has some mistaggings).
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
